Defending Burka to Kuffner

Charles Kuffner quotes Paul Burka, and then exclaims:

The bad news for Bell is that his success seems to have come not at Perry's expense but at Strayhorn's.

Dude. All campaign long you've said that the reason why Rick Perry is unbeatable despite poll numbers in the 30s is because none of his opponents have been able to coalesce the anti-Perry vote. Now we see Chris Bell doing exactly that - this is what it means when some of Strayhorn's support migrates to Bell, as was the case when Friedman started losing voters to Bell - and it's still bad news?

I see Kuffner's point -- I noticed the same thing.

But I think Burka's point is that Bell is only snagging a point or two off of Strayhorn. Strayhorn isn't falling precipitously, and Perry isn't moving at all. There's not much evidence that Bell has really coalesced an anti-Perry vote around himself. If that's the case and Bell doesn't take any votes from Perry, then Perry isn't beatable. Of course, my guess is that the polls probably overstate Strayhorn's percentage by a couple points, while underdoing Perry's and Bell's percentages by a few points.

Posted by Evan @ 11/01/06 06:56 AM

 
 

Previous Entry | Home | Next Entry



Comments

>>But I think Burka's point is that Bell is only snagging a point or two off of Strayhorn. Strayhorn isn't falling precipitously, and Perry isn't moving at all.<<

I think that's the right way to read Burka. Cutting into Strayhorn's lead just a little following your one-shot $2-3 million media buy courtesy of John O'Quinn isn't "coalescing" (i.e. making it into one, as "coalescing" is defined) the anti-Perry vote, as you point out. And that's leaving aside movement that might be explained by the margin of error in the polls.

Of the two statements, it's the "coalescing" statement that seems less right at this point. I think it's entirely possible that some bloggers get so emotionally invested in these races that analysis can suffer.

Posted by kevin @ 11/01/06 08:10 AM


Evan, I see what you're saying, and that's a fair interpretation. I still think it wouldn't have killed Burka to at least acknowledge the point I raised, however.

Oh, and Kevin, I agree with you. Some bloggers most certainly do <a href="http://lonestartimes.com/20...">get so emotionally involved</a> in these races that they lose perspective.

Posted by Charles Kuffner @ 11/01/06 03:47 PM


>>Some bloggers most certainly do <a href="http://lonestartimes.com/20...">get so emotionally involved</a> in these races that they lose perspective.<<

Nice try, Charles. Except I've made it clear that I've not decided who gets my vote (if anyone) and I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do with their vote (if voters can't figure that out themselves, I hope they stay the hell away from the ballot box).

However, if you take exception with any of the points I've made at Lone Star Times about what conservatives ought to consider when they go to the ballot box, please do share.

To recap those points: Conservatives ought not have any illusions that Richard Friedman is a conservative (he isn't) or a serious person (he's an entertainer), they ought not have any illusions that he can win (he can't), and they ought to be aware that if they (conservatives) vote for him, they increase the chances of Chris Bell winning (because of straight ticket voting and a large potential base).

If you disagree with ANY of those points I made to a decidedly conservative audience, please do share! Otherwise, I'll just assume that was pure substance-free snark on your part that was off the mark. I don't have ANY emotional investment in this group of candidates, which I've called underwhelming in several places.

As for "coalescing" -- I still don't know why Burka would acknowledge an unestablished fact? The term isn't accurate.

Posted by kevin @ 11/01/06 06:56 PM


Here's how I read Burka. There were two possible ways to beat Perry. (1) Coalesce the anti-Perry vote. None of Perry's three rivals could break away from the pack, and in particular neither Bell nor Strayhorn could kill the other off, Bell because he had the Democratic base, Strayhorn because she had money. (2) Take votes away from Perry. Bell couldn't do that. As Burka wrote many times, Republicans will not vote for a Democrat unless the Republican candidate makes an utter fool of himself, as in Claytie Williams. Strayhorn could take Republican votes (particularly women)from Perry and indeed did do it, but she wasn't credible enough to establish herself as the only person who could beat Perry. Her poor debate performance, combined with Bell's good performance, ruined whatever chance she had. I don't see any inconsistencies in this argument.

Posted by Paul Burka @ 11/01/06 11:50 PM


Well the way I read Burka is that both 1 & 2 have to happen. Or maybe that's my own opinion.

Posted by evan @ 11/02/06 12:10 AM


My last comment was obviously said light-heartedly, for the reading-challenged.

Posted by evan @ 11/02/06 12:17 AM


Add Comments

No flames or impolite behavior. HTML will be stripped. URLs will be transformed into hyperlinks.

 


Comments must be approved before being published.

SITE MENU

+ Rick Perry vs World
+ About Me

+ Archives

+ Email:
  perryvsworld* at *gmail dot com

DISCLAIMER

All content © Rick Perry vs. World and the respective authors.

Rick Perry vs. World is powered by Nucleus.

Site design and Nucleus customization by Kevin Whited.


ARCHIVES

+August 2017
+July 2017
+June 2017
+May 2017
+April 2017
+March 2017
+February 2017
+January 2017
+December 2016
+November 2016
+October 2016
+September 2016
+August 2016
+July 2016
+June 2016
+May 2016
+April 2016
+March 2016
+February 2016
+January 2016
+December 2015
+November 2015
+October 2015
+September 2015
+August 2015
+July 2015
+June 2015
+May 2015
+April 2015
+March 2015
+February 2015
+January 2015
+December 2014
+November 2014
+October 2014
+September 2014
+August 2014
+July 2014
+June 2014
+May 2014
+April 2014
+March 2014
+February 2014
+January 2014
+December 2013
+November 2013
+October 2013
+September 2013
+August 2013
+July 2013
+June 2013
+May 2013
+April 2013
+March 2013
+February 2013
+January 2013
+December 2012
+November 2012
+October 2012
+September 2012
+August 2012
+July 2012
+June 2012
+May 2012
+April 2012
+March 2012
+February 2012
+January 2012
+December 2011
+November 2011
+October 2011
+September 2011
+August 2011
+July 2011
+June 2011
+May 2011
+April 2011
+March 2011
+February 2011
+January 2011
+December 2010
+November 2010
+October 2010
+September 2010
+August 2010
+July 2010
+June 2010
+May 2010
+April 2010
+March 2010
+February 2010
+January 2010
+December 2009
+November 2009
+October 2009
+September 2009
+August 2009
+July 2009
+June 2009
+May 2009
+April 2009
+March 2009
+February 2009
+January 2009
+December 2008
+November 2008
+October 2008
+September 2008
+August 2008
+July 2008
+June 2008
+May 2008
+April 2008
+March 2008
+February 2008
+January 2008
+December 2007
+November 2007
+October 2007
+September 2007
+August 2007
+July 2007
+June 2007
+May 2007
+April 2007
+March 2007
+February 2007
+January 2007
+December 2006
+November 2006
+October 2006
+September 2006
+August 2006
+July 2006
+June 2006
+May 2006
+April 2006
+March 2006
+February 2006
+January 2006
+December 2005
+November 2005
+October 2005
+September 2005
+August 2005
+July 2005
+June 2005
+May 2005
+April 2005
+March 2005
+February 2005
+January 2005
+December 2004
Links:
+Acton MBA
+EVN
+Ethereum News
+ICO Calendar
+How to prepare for CFA exams